On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 08:42 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > In the commit message of your patch you wrote "For all sendpage() providers, > its a transparent change.". Why does AF_ALG need special handling? > If users have to care about MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST it is no longer really an > internal flag. MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST is an internal (kernel) flag. Fact that I missed some MSG_MORE 'users' in the kernel was an oversight. I am not saying your patch is not needed, I am only saying it reverts a useful TCP optimization, and we can do better, dont we ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
