[PATCH 09/14] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Break init_and_link_pwq() into init_pwq() and link_pwq() and move
unbound-workqueue specific handling into apply_workqueue_attrs().
Also, factor out unbound pool and pool_workqueue allocation into
alloc_unbound_pwq().

This reorganization is to prepare for NUMA affinity and doesn't
introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5b53705..58c7663 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3626,13 +3626,10 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 }
 
-static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
-			      struct workqueue_struct *wq,
-			      struct worker_pool *pool,
-			      struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
+static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+		     struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
-	int node;
-
 	BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
 
 	pwq->pool = pool;
@@ -3642,8 +3639,15 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->delayed_works);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->mayday_node);
 	INIT_WORK(&pwq->unbound_release_work, pwq_unbound_release_workfn);
+}
 
-	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+/* sync @pwq with the current state of its associated wq and link it */
+static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+		     struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+{
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set the matching work_color.  This is synchronized with
@@ -3658,14 +3662,29 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
 
 	/* link in @pwq */
 	list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
+}
 
-	if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
-		copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
-		for_each_node(node)
-			rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+/* obtain a pool matching @attr and create a pwq associating the pool and @wq */
+static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+					const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+{
+	struct worker_pool *pool;
+	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
+
+	pool = get_unbound_pool(attrs);
+	if (!pool)
+		return NULL;
+
+	pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pwq) {
+		put_unbound_pool(pool);
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+	init_pwq(pwq, wq, pool);
+	return pwq;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -3686,8 +3705,8 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 			  const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
 {
 	struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq = NULL, *last_pwq;
-	struct worker_pool *pool;
+	struct pool_workqueue *pwq, *last_pwq;
+	int node;
 
 	/* only unbound workqueues can change attributes */
 	if (WARN_ON(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
@@ -3706,22 +3725,21 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-
-	pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pwq) {
-		mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, new_attrs);
+	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	if (!pwq)
 		goto enomem;
-	}
 
-	pool = get_unbound_pool(new_attrs);
-	if (!pool) {
-		mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-		goto enomem;
-	}
+	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	link_pwq(pwq, &last_pwq);
+
+	copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, new_attrs);
+	for_each_node(node)
+		rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 
-	init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, pool, &last_pwq);
 	if (last_pwq) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&last_pwq->pool->lock);
 		put_pwq(last_pwq);
@@ -3731,7 +3749,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	return 0;
 
 enomem:
-	kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
 	free_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -3752,7 +3769,11 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 			struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
 				per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
 
-			init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri], NULL);
+			init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri]);
+
+			mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+			link_pwq(pwq, NULL);
+			mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 		}
 		return 0;
 	} else {
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux