Use kmem_cache_alloc_node() with @pool->node instead of kmem_cache_zalloc() when allocating a pool_workqueue so that it's allocated on the same node as the associated worker_pool. As there's no no kmem_cache_zalloc_node(), move zeroing to init_pwq(). This was suggested by Lai Jiangshan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@xxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 58c7663..a4420be 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3626,12 +3626,14 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); } -/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */ +/* initialize newly alloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */ static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct worker_pool *pool) { BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK); + memset(pwq, 0, sizeof(*pwq)); + pwq->pool = pool; pwq->wq = wq; pwq->flush_color = -1; @@ -3677,7 +3679,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq, if (!pool) return NULL; - pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL); + pwq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL, pool->node); if (!pwq) { put_unbound_pool(pool); return NULL; -- 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html