We declare 'exact' without initializing it and then do:
[...]
if (strlen(p->cru_driver_name))
exact = 1;
if (priority && !exact)
return -EINVAL;
[...]
If the first 'if' is not true, then the second will test an
uninitialized 'exact'.
As far as I can tell, what we want is for 'exact' to be initialized to
0 (zero/false).
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
crypto/crypto_user.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Compile tested only.
diff --git a/crypto/crypto_user.c b/crypto/crypto_user.c
index 16f8693..36a2af7 100644
--- a/crypto/crypto_user.c
+++ b/crypto/crypto_user.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int crypto_del_alg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
static int crypto_add_alg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
- int exact;
+ int exact = 0;
const char *name;
struct crypto_alg *alg;
struct crypto_user_alg *p = nlmsg_data(nlh);
--
1.7.8.4
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
