On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 13:32 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Instead of having (different) defaults in sl[aou]b, perhaps we should > just remove the defaults completely, to ensure all architectures set > ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN to the correct value? What is 'correct'? The architecture sets it to the minimum value that it can cope with, according to its own alignment constraints (and DMA/cache constraints, in the case of ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN). Some architectures don't _have_ any minimum required alignment, so they have no need to set it. If the architecture _does_ specify a minimum, the allocators must honour it. Otherwise, they're free to do their own thing. And slob chooses to use a smaller alignment than slab and slub do, in accordance with its design and its raison d'être. -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
