On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:24:20 +0800 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:53:07PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > Yep, it is fine. > > #1 in, #2 not will not result in any difference to what we have now. > > #2 in, #1 not will result in "padlock not detected" while loading the > > module and -ENODEV. > > Let's merge #1 right now and I'll pick up #2 once #1 shows up > in linux-net. > #1 is in 2.6.30-rc now but I don't see #2 pending anywhere. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
