On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:53:07PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Yep, it is fine. > #1 in, #2 not will not result in any difference to what we have now. > #2 in, #1 not will result in "padlock not detected" while loading the > module and -ENODEV. Let's merge #1 right now and I'll pick up #2 once #1 shows up in linux-net. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
