Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:06:39PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > Well it's not that useful for an assembly implementation
> > that works on all instances of a given architecture.
> 
> I meant on x86. Sure for other architectures the C version is needed.

My point was that while it's not useful for aes-i586 on x86,
it definitely is useful for padlock-aes which is also x86 asm
but only works on a subset of x86 processors.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux