Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:37:01AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> 
> BTW, here are figures I got with 2 different versions of the driver
> when using tcrypt module. The second being the result with the
> optimized driver (no key reloading on each block):
> 
> normal version:
> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 67991 cycles (8192 
> bytes)
> 
> optimized version:
> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 51783 cycles (8192 
> bytes)
> 
> So the gain is 16000 cycles which seems to worth the change, isn't it ?

Sounds like it would.  It would help of course if you posted the patch :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux