On 01/11/2018 04:51, Jann Horn wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:59 AM James Bottomley > <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 11:52 +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Any comment on this last version? >>> >>> Any chance to be merged? >> >> I've got a use case for this: I went to one of the Graphene talks in >> Edinburgh and it struck me that we seem to keep reinventing the type of >> sandboxing that qemu-user already does. However if you want to do an >> x86 on x86 sandbox, you can't currently use the binfmt_misc mechanism >> because that has you running *every* binary on the system emulated. >> Doing it per user namespace fixes this problem and allows us to at >> least cut down on all the pointless duplication. > > Waaaaaait. What? qemu-user does not do "sandboxing". qemu-user makes > your code slower and *LESS* secure. As far as I know, qemu-user is > only intended for purposes like development and testing. > I think the idea here is not to run qemu, but to use an interpreter (something like gVisor) into a container to control the binaries execution inside the container without using this interpreter on the host itself (container and host shares the same binfmt_misc magic/mask). Thanks, Laurent _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
