On 12/24/2015 12:36 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...] Hi Eric, Happy new year and sorry for the late reply.
Given the other constraints on an implementation the pid namespace looks by far the one best suited to host such a sysctl if it is possible to implement safely.
So you think it's better to isolate the core_pattern in pid_namespace, am I right? But, core_file_path and user_mode_helper_path in core_pattern are much more related with mnt_namespace IMO. Could you help to explain it more? Thanx Yang
Eric .
_______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
