On 12/20/2015 10:37 AM, Al Viro wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:14:29AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/17/2015 07:23 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
Hi guys,
We are working on making core dump behaviour isolated in
container. But the problem is, the /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
is a kernel wide setting, not belongs to a container.
So we want to add core_pattern into mnt namespace. What
do you think about it?
Hi Eric,
I found your patch about "net: Implement the per network namespace
sysctl infrastructure", I want to do the similar thing
in mnt namespace. Is that suggested way?
Why mnt namespace and not something else?
Hi Al,
Well, because core_pattern indicates the path to store core file.
In different mnt namespace, we would like to change the path with
different value.
In addition, Let's considering other namespaces:
UTS ns: contains informations of kernel and arch, not proper for
core_pattern.
IPC ns: communication informations, not proper for core_pattern
PID ns: core_pattern is not related with pid
net ns: obviousely no.
user ns: not proper too.
Then I believe it's better to do this in mnt namespace. of course,
core_pattern is just one example. After this infrastructure finished,
we can implement more sysctls as per-mnt if necessary, I think.
Al, what do you think about this idea?
Yang
.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
