On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:53:12AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Serge. > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:58:53PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > I mispoke before though - it's not the hierarchy's root dentry, > > but rather a dentry for a descendent cgroup which will become the > > root dentry for the new superblock. We do know that there must be > > a css_set with a cgroup. I'm still trying to track down whether > > that cgrou's inode's dentry can ever be flushed. I would think > > not but am not sure. > > Hmmm... I'm not really following. The inode can be flushed and that's > why it needs to be walked down from root. What am I missing here? Can it be flushed when we know that the cgroup is being pinned by a css_set? (There's either a task or a cgroup_namespace pinning it or we wouldn't get here) -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
