Hello, Serge. On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:58:53PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > I mispoke before though - it's not the hierarchy's root dentry, > but rather a dentry for a descendent cgroup which will become the > root dentry for the new superblock. We do know that there must be > a css_set with a cgroup. I'm still trying to track down whether > that cgrou's inode's dentry can ever be flushed. I would think > not but am not sure. Hmmm... I'm not really following. The inode can be flushed and that's why it needs to be walked down from root. What am I missing here? Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
