On 06/18/2014 10:02 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 06/17, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> >> On 06/17/2014 02:21 PM, Chen Hanxiao wrote: >>> + case PIDTYPE_PID: >>> + ret = task_pid_nr_ns(task, ns2); >> >> But this is not correct. If task doesn't live in ns2, but ns2 >> just has the ns->level small enough, then the wrong pid value >> would be reported. > > Confused... pid_nr_ns() checks upid->ns == ns and returns zero > otherwise? Yes, you're right. I've missed that line of code :( > Oleg. > > . > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
