On 06/17, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > On 06/17/2014 02:21 PM, Chen Hanxiao wrote: > > + case PIDTYPE_PID: > > + ret = task_pid_nr_ns(task, ns2); > > But this is not correct. If task doesn't live in ns2, but ns2 > just has the ns->level small enough, then the wrong pid value > would be reported. Confused... pid_nr_ns() checks upid->ns == ns and returns zero otherwise? Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
