Quoting Peter Dolding (oiaohm@xxxxxxxxx): > I followed the Maintainers File. https://www.kernel.org/doc/linux/MAINTAINERS > CONTROL GROUPS (CGROUPS) > M: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> > M: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > L: containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Odd, my version has L: containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx L: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The cgroups entry was added in November 2011 according to git-blame. I don't know why the kernel.org version is so old. Still I think that should be patched to remove containers@. I originally objected to the cgroup@ list creation, but since I do not believe the relevant cgroup folks read the containers@ list any more, I don't think containers@ should be listed - certainly not first. > S: Maintained > F: include/linux/cgroup* > F: kernel/cgroup* > F: mm/*cgroup* > > > Apparently by your response this might be a bit out of date. I just read > lwm and *Tejun Heo is not even as a main maintainer. Listed as a sub part > maintainer. By the maintainers file discussions should be in * > containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx where I sent this. > > Tejun Heo please inform if this is still correct. Its either update this > or tell lwn.net to get your title correct in future. > > Serge I am trying to follow policy that is why I posted here in the first > place. That sounds unnecessarily defensive - I wasn't complaining, just trying to help your email get to where it would be best discussed :) Sorry that it involves an extra step (resending), but I didn't want to simply reply cc:ing cgroups@, as the email thread tends to get funky that way. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
