Re: [OFFLIST] status of devcg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@xxxxxxxxxx):
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:12:06PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Before I respond to that, could you please tell me precisely what
> > you mean by 'unified hierarchy'?  I thought it just meant all
> > controllers composed into one mount.  Maybe it means something
> > else.
> 
> Oh, it's gonna be a hierarchy which can dynamically enable / disable
> controllers in sub-hierarchies, so it isn't just co-mounting
> everything, which really wouldn't work for many use cases.  As some

I see.  (I'll let that sink in for a bit then look back at Aristeu's
email :)

> controllers are outright hostile against being co-mounted and this is
> basically gonna be v2 (or v1.1 whatever) of the itnerface, I'm trying
> to weed out weird behaviors.
> 
> Thanks.

Thanks

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux