Re: [OFFLIST] status of devcg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@xxxxxxxxxx):
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:34:05AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > FWIW, libvirt's usage of devcg is to deny all by default, allow major 136
> > (for all /dev/pts/*), followed by allow (major,minor) pair for each specific
> > whitelisted devices. As such we don't have anything that relies on ordering
> > of rules in devcg.
> 
> I'd personally much prefer something very simple - allow all by
> default, allow only the specified if explicitly specified.  I really
> don't want full iptables like facility inside devcg.
> 
> Thanks.

FWIW lxc is also quite happy with the simple rules.

Is there something in particular you want to accomplish for which the
current rules do not suffice?
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux