Quoting Aaron Staley (aaron@xxxxxxxxxxx): > The behavior it fixes sounds similar to what I'm seeing. However, if I read > the logs correctly, wasn't this committed into Linux 3.5? If so, wouldn't > Linux 3.8.0-25-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP (where I can reproduce the problem) > already have this fix? Hi, I've been trying to reproduce this in ubuntu raring, but couldn't. I started a shell as unprivileged user, and stuck it in a memory cgroup with memory.limit_in_bytes set to 10M. Did dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/xxx bs=1M count=100M - it was slow, and memory.failcnt hit 1612526, but it did in the end succeed. kernel here is 3.8.0-23-generic #34-Ubuntu, slightly older than you. Maybe you're onto a new regression? -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
