Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2013/01/28 11:43, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> This patch allow the unprivileged user to mount mqueuefs in >>> user ns. >>> >>> If two userns share the same ipcns,the files in mqueue fs >>> should be seen in both these two userns. >>> >>> If the userns has its own ipcns,it has its own mqueue fs too. >>> ipcns has already done this job well. >> >> I am a little dense. When does userspace actually mount a mqueuefs? >> My impression was that user space never needed to mount and actually >> never could mount a mqueuefs. MS_NO_USER isn't set so mounting a >> mqueuefs is possible but when does it happen and why? >> > > Actually the files which representative messgae queue in mqueuefs contains > some informations,such as QSIZE,NOTIFY,SIGNO,NOTIFY_PID. > > My workstation is Fedora 17,mqueuefs is mounted on /dev/mqueue by default. > So I think at lest this patch is needed by some people. I have just confirmed that the most you can do in a mounted mqueue fs is to create files message queues. Given that these filesystems exist anyway I don't see a problem. Applied thanks. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
