Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hello, Rusty. > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:17:11AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> > So, I guess this currently is caught in a place which isn't here or >> > there. I'm pretty skeptical whether it makes sense to bother about >> > static usages tho. Can I keep them for static ones? >> >> I didn't realize that cpuset_attach was a fastpath. If it is, put a > > It isn't a hot path. It's just a bit nasty to have to allocate them > separately. > >> static there and I'll fix turn it into a bitmap when I need to. >> Otherwise, please don't change the code in the first place. > > So, the plan to drop cpumask_t is still on? If so, I'll leave > cpumask_var_t. Yep! Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
