Hello, Rusty. On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:17:11AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > So, I guess this currently is caught in a place which isn't here or > > there. I'm pretty skeptical whether it makes sense to bother about > > static usages tho. Can I keep them for static ones? > > I didn't realize that cpuset_attach was a fastpath. If it is, put a It isn't a hot path. It's just a bit nasty to have to allocate them separately. > static there and I'll fix turn it into a bitmap when I need to. > Otherwise, please don't change the code in the first place. So, the plan to drop cpumask_t is still on? If so, I'll leave cpumask_var_t. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
