Quoting Linus Torvalds (torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Eric W. Biederman > <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > That said Serge I think I have lost track of the point of your question. > > .. and I'm a bit unsure what I should do about this all. Including > pulling the pull request that actually can make this all matter. Sorry I didn't mean to complicate this. I did ack the patch and we can cull the cc list for continued discussion. In practical terms, the only thing the patch prevent is having two separate tasks each clone a new user ns with the same uid mapping, and having consistent relationships between the same uids between the namespaces. It's worth it to prevent (or while we consider) the case Andy and Eric bring up. > Hmm? Any consensus? Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
