On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Eric W. Biederman > <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> That said Serge I think I have lost track of the point of your question. > > .. and I'm a bit unsure what I should do about this all. Including > pulling the pull request that actually can make this all matter. > > Hmm? Any consensus? I think that, if Eric submits a newer version that renames the loop variable for added comprehensibility, I'm okay with it. Changing the semantics to a more expansive version like Serge was talking about later on wouldn't break anything. But I don't think there's any reason to change it. --Andy _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
