Hello, Glauber. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:38:32PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > Because I am allocating an array big enough to hold one entry per memcg. > The natural array index for this, is the css_id. Obviously, I don't want > this array to have 65k entries in size, so I resize it (doubling every > time) Because I don't know the css_id at this time, I have to do it later. > > Another option for this - which I also considered - would be to use a > different index. We get more packing, since not all memcgs will be kmem > limited (and the index would contain only the kmem limited memcgs), and > we can allocate this index during ->create(). > > I initially picked the css_index because I though a specialized index > might be confusing. But if you feel strongly about all the allocations > happening inside ->create(), this would be a way to avoid it. Would you > prefer that? I'll think more about it. The whole css_id thing might need some soul searching too anyway. Let's continue this one your patch thread. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
