Hello, On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:19:51PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > I don't see post_create failing as a huge problem. The natural > synchronization point would be "right after post_create" - then you can > definitely tell that it is online. Although this can be viewed a bit as > "exposing internals", creating is different then destroying: When you > create, you may not have all data yet. When destroying, you do - and > want to get rid of it. So this kind of bootstrapping is pretty standard > and common. More proper names for these callbacks would be, ->allocate() ->online() ->offline() ->free() And I may rename them. I don't wanna make ->online() failable. Why can't you just allocate everything from ->allocate() and use it from ->online()? Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
