On 10/31/2012 09:18 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:49:33PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: >> The only think that drew my attention is that you are changing the >> local_irq_save callsite to local_irq_disable. It shouldn't be a problem, >> since this is never expected to be called in interrupt context. >> >> Still... it makes me wonder if that disabled-interrupt block is still >> needed? According to the changelogs, it was introduced in e7c5ec919 for >> the css_tryget mechanism. But css_tryget itself will never scan >> subsystems, so if we can no longer fail, we should be able to just ditch >> it. Unless I am missing something > > Note both in the commit messages. > I am sorry, but I can't find anything that may be related to this in the commit messages. Can you be more specific ? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
