On 10/24, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > I'd prefer to simply clear PF_NOFREEZE (without set_freezable), but > > obviously this doesn't look exactly right from cgroup_freezer pov. > > I don't think it matters all that much. It's a pretty special case. OK. > Maybe define PF_CLEAR_ON_EXEC_MASK or something and just include > PF_NOFREEZE in it? May be... but it will have a single user and sched.h is already huge, so didn't do this. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
