Hello, Oleg. On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 05:55:33PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Ooh, ouch, definitely. We should clear that. Can you please make a > > patch? > > Sure... but what do you think is better? > > I'd prefer to simply clear PF_NOFREEZE (without set_freezable), but > obviously this doesn't look exactly right from cgroup_freezer pov. I don't think it matters all that much. It's a pretty special case. Maybe define PF_CLEAR_ON_EXEC_MASK or something and just include PF_NOFREEZE in it? Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
