On 06/03/2012 09:47 AM, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 08:23 , Jeff Liu wrote:
Hi Kirill,
On 06/02/2012 11:21 PM, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
Not having looked closely at the original patchset, let me ask - is this
feature going to be a freebie with Eric's usernamespace patches?
It we can reach a consensus to bind quota on mount namespace for
container or other things maybe.
1. OpenVZ doesn't use mount namespaces and still has quotas per container.
AFAICS, OpenVZ has self-released quota tools to supply this feature.
but standard quota tools work inside container w/o any modifications.
This is very important for us, cause we run unmodified distros inside.
Yes, am agree.
I can work out a new patches regarding quota tools based on mount namespace w/o any modification.
Jeff, why do you need fs namespace for quotas? OpenVZ works w/o it.
It sounds as too strict use case limitation. Or do I understand your patchset description wrong?
OpenVZ has its own kernel, with its very own isolation capabilities.
So in upstream, something has to be used instead.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
