On 01/19, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov (oleg@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > But we did > > have a reason (reasons?). Hopefully, the only really important reason > > was already removed by 087806b1. > > Ah. So the leader->group_leader may have been necessary earlier in order > to prevent two tasks, old leader and new leader from both returning true > for thread_group_leader(tsk). Not really. de_thread() does release_task(old_leader). Please look, for example, at __exit_signal(). thread_group_leader() must not be true in this case. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
