>>> There may be other ways to cobble this sort of safety together, but >>> they are less appealing for various reasons. cgroups are how we >>> control groups of related pids. >>> >>> I'd really love to be able to use this. >> >> Has it been confirmed that this implementation actually solves the >> problem? ie: tested a bit? >> >> btw, Frederic told me that this version of the patchset had some >> serious problem so it's on hold pending an upgrade, regardless of other >> matters. > > Yep. The particular issue is https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/13/532 > > Li Zefan proposed a fix (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/17/26) which I'm > currently reworking. > We really need to coordinate cgroup patches. I mean, the patchset+fix conflict with Tejun's work, and the conflict is not trivial. > But then I'd love it if you can test this subsystem to see if it really matches > your needs, Tim. > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
