On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 03:09:31 +0100 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/04/2011 01:40 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > As discussed at Kernel Summit(2011), new cgroups mailing list is opened by > > James. This list is for discussing general cgroup design and patches > > including all subsystems and for getting more attentions to cgroups/namespaces > > related issues by developpers. > > > > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > I don't see the point to unilaterally change the mailing list to > vger.kernel.org as the discussions will be the same as the actual > mailing list containers@. May be there is a good reason to do that but I > don't see it, can someone enlight me please ? > I know containers@ and subscribing it. Maybe this article is good. http://lwn.net/Articles/464288/ I think there are cgroups not-for-container but total view/interaction are required. someones may use cgroup just as resource controller (as libvirt, systemd) and not be intereted in container itself. I personally think cgroups@ is a straightforward name to kernel developpers. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
