On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:16:50PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:55:11 PDT, Matt Helsley said: > > > Now we're back with a new minimal patch set. You're asking us to do the same > > thing and expect different results -- stack more patches on top and expect to > > get it reviewed. OK, but what reason do we have to believe this time will be > > any different? > > Has the terrain changed any since last time? In particular, ISTR a bunch of > activity in namespace support since last time - does that change what your > patch set needs to do? Good question. Unfortunately it doesn't reduce what our patch set needs to do at this point. The primary namespace changes that happened about 10+ kernel versions ago (circa 2.6.28) are essential for containers and reliable checkpoint/restart. Since then namespace improvements have nothing or very little to do with enabling checkpoint/restart -- it's all for containers. Cheers, -Matt Helsley _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
