On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:55:11 -0700 Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > However I think we need some review before we continue modifying it. We > had a minimal patch set which evolved into the current maximal set. It > never really got the reviews outside our little group that it needed. > Now we're back with a new minimal patch set. You're asking us to do the same > thing and expect different results -- stack more patches on top and expect to > get it reviewed. OK, but what reason do we have to believe this time will be > any different? None whatsoever. It could be that the two sets "a sufficiently useful c/r implementation" and "a c/r implementation which will be acceptable" have no intersection. IOW, there is no solution. But I haven't looked at c/r patches in quite some time, hence the hand-waving and useless platitudes. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
