Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > As you know, we started with a minimal patchset, then grew it over time > > to answer the "but how will you (xyz) without uglifying the kernel". > > Would you recommend we go back to keeping a separate minimal patchset, > > or that we develop on the current, pretty feature-full version? I'm not > > convinced believe there will be bandwidth to keep two trees and do both > > justice. > > The minimal patchset is too minimal for Oren's use and the maximal > patchset seems to have run aground on general kernel sentiment. So I Sorry, when you say 'minimal patchset', are you referring to Nathan's tree? Or a truly minimal patchset like what we originally started with? thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
