Re: [PATCH] user_ns: Improve the user_ns on-the-slab packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07/2010 05:27 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx):
>> Currently on 64-bit arch the user_namespace is 2096 and when
>> being kmalloc-ed it resides on a 4k slab wasting 2003 bytes.
>>
>> If we allocate a separate cache for it and reduce the hash size
>> from 128 to 64 chains the packaging becomes *much* better - the
> 
> Hey Pavel,
> 
> I trust you've done some performance tests and found no
> regressions with a few hundred users?

How many hundreds are you interested in? :) 128 users didn't
reveal any regressions.

> -serge
> 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux