Re: [PATCH] user_ns: Improve the user_ns on-the-slab packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> Currently on 64-bit arch the user_namespace is 2096 and when
> being kmalloc-ed it resides on a 4k slab wasting 2003 bytes.
> 
> If we allocate a separate cache for it and reduce the hash size
> from 128 to 64 chains the packaging becomes *much* better - the

Hey Pavel,

I trust you've done some performance tests and found no
regressions with a few hundred users?

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux