On 11/19/2010 05:27 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec . >> >> Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful >> for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole >> checkpointer inside the kernel. It sure would be harder but hey >> that's the way it is. > > System call for one bit? This is ridiculous. Why not just a flag in proc entry? It's a frigging single bit. > Doing execve(2) for userspace C/R is ridicoulous too (and likely > doesn't work). Really, whatever. Just keep doing what you're doing. Hey, if it makes you happy, it can't be too wrong. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
