On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec . > > Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful > for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole > checkpointer inside the kernel. It sure would be harder but hey > that's the way it is. System call for one bit? This is ridiculous. Doing execve(2) for userspace C/R is ridicoulous too (and likely doesn't work). _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
