Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@xxxxxxxxxx): > * And, most of all, there are userland implementation and > virtualization, making the benefit to overhead ratio completely off. > Userland implementation _already_ achieves most of what's necessary Guess I'll just be offensive here and say, straight-out: I don't believe it. Can I see the userspace implementation of c/r? If it's as good as the kernel level c/r, then aweseome - we don't need the kernel patches. If it's not as good, then the thing is, we're not drawing arbitrary lines saying "is this good enough", rather we want completely reliable and transparent c/r. IOW, the running task and the other end can't tell that a migration happened, and, if checkpoint says it worked, then restart must succeed. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
