On 11/17/2010 06:46 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Serge. > > On 11/17/2010 04:39 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>> I'm sorry but in-kernel CR already looks like a major misdesign to me. >> >> By this do you mean the very idea of having CR support in the kernel? >> Or our design of it in the kernel? > > The former, I'm afraid. Can you elaborate on this please? >> Let's go back to July 2008, at the containers mini-summit, where it >> was unanimously agreed upon that the kernel was the right place >> (Checkpoint/Resetart [CR] under >> http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Mini-summit_2008_notes ), and that >> we would start by supporting a single task with no resources. Was >> that whole discussion effectively misguided, in your opinion? Or do >> you feel that since the first steps outlined in that discussion >> we've either "gone too far" or strayed in the subsequent design? > > The conclusion doesn't seem like such a good idea, well, at least to > me for what it's worth. Conclusions at summits don't carry decisive > weight. It'll still have to prove its worthiness for mainline all the > same and in light of already working userland alternative and the > expanded area now covered by virtualization, the arguments in this > thread don't seem too strong. > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
