On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:53:28PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote: > Not all filesystems will necessarily be able to support relinking an > orphan inode back into the filesystem. Some offlist feedback suggested > that instead of overloading .link that relinking should be a separate > file operation for this reason. > > Since .relink is a superset of .link make the VFS call .relink where > possible and .link otherwise. > > The next commit will change ext3/4 to enable this operation. I may have missed something in one of these patches (patch 1 and any original summary if there was one don't appear in my email), but what is the point of the new operation? I didn't see any case that treats one any different than the other. What is disallowed (and how) for a driver which does not implement .relink but has .link? Brad Boyer flar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
