On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32:26PM +0200, Jan Safranek wrote: > On 07/23/2010 04:07 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:14:01PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH<gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it >>>>>> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount controllers on respective >>>>>> directories. >>>>> >>>>> Lennart and Kay, is this what systemd is doing? I really don't think we >>>>> should be adding a root /cgroup/ mount point to the system for something >>>>> like this. >>>> >>>> Already solved. Systemd always mounts an empty tmpfs at the 'cgroup' >>>> mountpoint, and stuff is free to create subdirs there. Systemd itself >>>> mount 'systemd' there. >>> >>> Ah, that makes it easier. Paul and Vivek, any objection to this patch >>> going in now? >>> >> >> This sounds reasonable to me also. >> >> Jan, I know you have been working in this area and raised concenrs about >> cgroup mount point in the past. Does it look good to you? > > I would prefer some place where subdirectories can be created for > individual hierarchies without additional tmpfs there. But as I understand > /sys, it's not an easy feature to implement it there, so no, I am not > against /sys/fs/cgroup. Great, thanks for letting us know. So, who can get this patch into mainline? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
