On 07/23/2010 04:07 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:14:01PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH<gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it >>>>> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount controllers on respective >>>>> directories. >>>> >>>> Lennart and Kay, is this what systemd is doing? I really don't think we >>>> should be adding a root /cgroup/ mount point to the system for something >>>> like this. >>> >>> Already solved. Systemd always mounts an empty tmpfs at the 'cgroup' >>> mountpoint, and stuff is free to create subdirs there. Systemd itself >>> mount 'systemd' there. >> >> Ah, that makes it easier. Paul and Vivek, any objection to this patch >> going in now? >> > > This sounds reasonable to me also. > > Jan, I know you have been working in this area and raised concenrs about > cgroup mount point in the past. Does it look good to you? I would prefer some place where subdirectories can be created for individual hierarchies without additional tmpfs there. But as I understand /sys, it's not an easy feature to implement it there, so no, I am not against /sys/fs/cgroup. Jan _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
