On 06/21, Louis Rilling wrote: > > On 18/06/10 19:55 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Yes, this should be fixed, I already realized this. work->func(ns) is > > called when ns is already fixed. > > > > Otherwise, nobody should use ns->proc_mount when ns is already dead/freed. > > I meant the opposite. proc_mnt can be kept mounted somewhere, I think, no. If it is kept mounted vfsmount should be different. > and accesses to it > will likely try to access (freed) pid_ns from it. Not sure, there must be no tasks (and pids) in this ns. By anyway I agree. This needs more thinking and we should do something with sb->s_fs_info. But given that nobody (including me) seem to like this approach - let's forget this patch. Thanks, Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
