Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx): > SH> So I'm afraid you're going to have to do a slightly uglier thing > SH> where you unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() and then > SH> switch_task_namespaces() to the new nsproxy. > > Well, I think that would be hidden in the nicer helper function I > think I'll need, which I eluded to in the patch header. This is just > an RFC proof that it can be done in this manner, but I think a > separate helper in nsproxy.c is in order to make it nice (and avoid > the extra alloc/free of the netns that copy_namespaces() will create). > Agreed? Yup - thanks! -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
