Re: [PATCH] [RFC] C/R: inet4 and inet6 unicast routes (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



SH> So I'm afraid you're going to have to do a slightly uglier thing
SH> where you unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() and then
SH> switch_task_namespaces() to the new nsproxy.

Well, I think that would be hidden in the nicer helper function I
think I'll need, which I eluded to in the patch header.  This is just
an RFC proof that it can be done in this manner, but I think a
separate helper in nsproxy.c is in order to make it nice (and avoid
the extra alloc/free of the netns that copy_namespaces() will create).
Agreed?

Thanks!

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux