Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > >> I pulled all the recent patches in linux-cr (except for ipv6 fixup > >> set), and created the following two branches: > >> > >> ckpt-v20-dev - patches applied onto pof v20 > >> ckpt-v21-rc1 - patches folded into a clean patchset > >> > >> Likewise with user-cr (but with more exceptions - working now on > >> pulling more patches in). > >> > >> This is totally untested except for successful compilation... > >> > >> Oren. > > > > v21 with the recent patches applied seems rock-solid to me, on > > x86-64, s390x, and powerpc. > > > > recent patches means: > > skip down interfaces v2, > > put fops->checkpoint under ifdef > > get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids, > > export net checkpoint fns > > > > for kernel and > > > > Add --nonetns switch to user-cr checkpoint > > fix vpids > > user-c/r: get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids > > > > to user-cr#ckpt-v20-dev > > > I pushed linux-cr:ckpt-v21-rc2 with: > > > skip down interfaces v2, > > put fops->checkpoint under ifdef > > get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids, > > export net checkpoint fns > > and user-cr:ckpt-v20-dev with: > > > fix vpids > > user-c/r: get rid of ckpt_hdr_vpids > plus Suka's two recent patches. > > Dan's --nonetns is pending - see my reply. > > > > > Do we want to try and incorporate Matt's patchset to clear out > > linux-2.6/checkpoint/ next, or ship what we have? > > IIRC there is at least one more comment from fsdevel that I need > to address, need to dig into emails again (file_pos_ ?). > > I hope to start tackling the transformation to matt's-format by > tomorrow, and will see how fast it goes. Alas after I sent this Nathan reported trouble on x86. I haven't gotten a x86-32 partition running yet so can't reproduce. Does anyone else have x86-32 with f12 they can test on? -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
